FS#79897 - [passim] Please package passim and passim-libs separately, as is found in Fedora
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Britt Yazel (brittyazel) - Monday, 09 October 2023, 21:56 GMT
Last edited by Toolybird (Toolybird) - Monday, 09 October 2023, 22:10 GMT
Opened by Britt Yazel (brittyazel) - Monday, 09 October 2023, 21:56 GMT
Last edited by Toolybird (Toolybird) - Monday, 09 October 2023, 22:10 GMT
|
Details
Passim is a hard dependency for fwupd at the moment, and
many are concerned by the fact that Passim has a hard
requirement on Avahi, and that Avahi is auto-activated by
Passim without the user's explicit say-so. While not
malicious, many users do not want mDNS and/or Avahi running
on their system for any number of reasons (such as using
systemd-resolved for mDNS), and likewise, the only reason
Passim is on the system in the first place is to facilitate
the fwupd dependency.
In a bug report to Richard Hughes (the author of Passim and fwupd), he mentioned that Fedora packages Passim and Passim-libs as separate packages, with fwupd being dependent only on the Passim-libs package to satisfy the libpassim.so dependency. Likewise, in Richard's own words: "In Fedora, passim-libs is installed by default, but the passim package (the daemon) is only installed when wanted. Can arch split up the passim package like that too?" https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/issues/6179 Would it be possible to follow Fedora's lead here and split up the packaging, and make Passim a user opt-in package/service? |
This task depends upon
Closed by Toolybird (Toolybird)
Monday, 09 October 2023, 22:10 GMT
Reason for closing: Duplicate
Additional comments about closing: FS#79614
Monday, 09 October 2023, 22:10 GMT
Reason for closing: Duplicate
Additional comments about closing: