FS#9753 - Make bash-completion a dependency on bash

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by kongokris 2 (nut543) - Monday, 03 March 2008, 15:13 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Wednesday, 05 March 2008, 23:14 GMT
Task Type Feature Request
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To No-one
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 2007.08-2
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

OR if that's a bad idea then post a post-install message:

"If you want [TAB]-completion of various cmdlines install the supplementary bash-completion package"

This is such an integral feature that i don't see why it should not be added as default or atleast told about in the post.install. I mean, is there someone here NOT using bash-completion?
This task depends upon

Closed by  Roman Kyrylych (Romashka)
Wednesday, 05 March 2008, 23:14 GMT
Reason for closing:  Won't implement
Comment by kongokris 2 (nut543) - Monday, 03 March 2008, 15:16 GMT
I just want to add that when i was first testing out linux distros i had no idea that a package called bash-completion was needed to get bash to complete with tab; i thought it was built in and so i was very confused when archlinux didn't have this very timesaving feature :/
Comment by Cesar Alcalde (noalwin) - Tuesday, 04 March 2008, 14:29 GMT
> I mean, is there someone here NOT using bash-completion?

I'm not using it. I see a performance loss when I use it.
Comment by kongokris 2 (nut543) - Tuesday, 04 March 2008, 17:15 GMT
hmm, ok. So we have one, i should have sucpected that when i wrote the comment :P anyway, i don't think a large population isn't using tab complete now and then...
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Wednesday, 05 March 2008, 14:21 GMT
Basic tab completion works fine without it. I don't like getting tab completion for commands using these -completion packages or scripts. When I press tab, I expect to get my filename completed, nothing else.
Comment by Greg (dolby) - Wednesday, 05 March 2008, 19:48 GMT
most completions are for deprecated applications and the package seems to be unmaintained at the moment. as pacman bash completion is included in the pacman package and every installation includes pacman that should be sufficient.

Loading...