FS#7172 - Licenses: Artistic
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Georg Grabler (STiAT) - Tuesday, 15 May 2007, 19:08 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Wednesday, 11 July 2007, 14:04 GMT
Opened by Georg Grabler (STiAT) - Tuesday, 15 May 2007, 19:08 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Wednesday, 11 July 2007, 14:04 GMT
|
Details
I want another license to be added. I didn't know where to
put this request, but since it's about perl licenses, i
decided to put it in the Packages:Current.
Perl has currently two common licenses which are used: The perl license itself (currently GPL2) and an artistic license. A lot of modules use "This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.". Some others use the artistic perl license (very common), found there http://perldoc.perl.org/perlartistic.html And i'd like to have it placed in common, since it's common that perl modules use it, just some are distributed under the terms of perl. Thanks, Georg |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dan McGee (toofishes)
Wednesday, 11 July 2007, 14:04 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: fixed in 2.0 pkg
Wednesday, 11 July 2007, 14:04 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: fixed in 2.0 pkg
perldoc -Tt perlartistic > license.txt works fine....
Should the directory be "PERLARTISTIC" then?
I'll add the licenses package to my TODO list, as there's a few other ones we wanted to add too
Additionally, why "PERLARTISTIC" directory? Why not "Artistic"? (or even make all license dirs lowercase)
EDIT: could you please add ISC license too?
See the SYNOPSIS on the license text above.
(Regarding the edit, I will spruce up the license package later today)
I'm willing to maintain this, but need a little guidance here. Which version of the artistic license?