AUR web interface

**This is the bug tracker for the AUR web interface.**

Use this tracker to report bugs or make feature requests regarding the behaviour or implementation of the AUR software.
Please read the Reporting Bug Guidelines before filing a new task.

- Please report bugs related to Arch Linux official packages here:
- Please report bugs for [community] packages here:
- For any packages in the AUR contact the maintainer or leave a comment on the package's detail page.

Source Code:

FS#55992 - RPC interface behaves inconsistant for split packages

Attached to Project: AUR web interface
Opened by Stefan Husmann (stefanhusmann) - Saturday, 14 October 2017, 19:33 GMT
Last edited by Eli Schwartz (eschwartz) - Monday, 19 March 2018, 17:16 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Backend
Status Closed
Assigned To No-one
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 4.4.0
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No



curl -sg "[]=handbrake-git"




curl -sg "[]=linux-rt-headers"{


"version":5,"type":"multiinfo","resultcount":1,"results":[{"ID":449437,"Name":"linux-rt-headers","PackageBaseID":51360,"PackageBase":"linux-rt","Version":"4.11.12_rt14-1","Description":"Header files and scripts for building modules for Linux-rt kernel","URL":"https:\/\/\/","NumVotes":143,"Popularity":0.301812,"OutOfDate":null,"Maintainer":"jhernberg","FirstSubmitted":1312920233,"LastModified":1507282616,"URLPath":"\/cgit\/aur.git\/snapshot\/linux-rt.tar.gz","MakeDepends":["xmlto","docbook-xsl","kmod","inetutils","bc","libelf"],"License":["GPL2"],"Keywords":[]}]}

I think this is due to the difference that linux-rt is included in the pkgname-array and handbrake-git is not.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Eli Schwartz (eschwartz)
Monday, 19 March 2018, 17:16 GMT
Reason for closing:  Duplicate
Additional comments about closing:  FS#57230
Comment by Remy Marquis (Spyhawk) - Sunday, 10 December 2017, 23:09 GMT
This doesn't seem to be a bug: the RPC queries for packages, not package bases.
Comment by Eli Schwartz (eschwartz) - Monday, 19 March 2018, 17:16 GMT
FS#57230 explains why this might be desirable in more detail, so closing in favor of that.