Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#5581 - unable to set framebuffer in vmware

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Josh Kampmeier (quiet) - Friday, 13 October 2006, 14:00 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Friday, 10 November 2006, 16:12 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category System
Status Closed
Assigned To Tobias Powalowski (tpowa)
Architecture not specified
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 0.7.2 Gimmick
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Running Arch inside of vmware(server or workstation), on a monitor capable of up to 1280x1024 resolution, no framebuffer settings are recognized. I have tried things like 0x31B and 0x31A, and as low as 773. Regardless of what vga= setting is used, it always returns the "you passed an undefined mode number"... [Enter] to view available modes or [Space] to continue thing.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Tobias Powalowski (tpowa)
Tuesday, 27 February 2007, 21:44 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Friday, 13 October 2006, 14:23 GMT
I have no problem with any framebuffer settings in vmware with resolutions up to 1024x768 (my monitor cannot show 1280x1024). :-/
Have you tried kernel26beyond with vesa-tng?
Comment by Woody Gilk (Shadowhand) - Friday, 13 October 2006, 15:24 GMT
I've had this same problem with Arch before. Something in Arch's config disallows setting the vga= parameter higher than the kernels checks allow, whereas in Gentoo, others, it lets you set it to anything you want, and it just doesn't work if you go too high.
Comment by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Friday, 13 October 2006, 15:27 GMT
Maybe compare Arch's and Gentoo's config in the framebuffer area? If they will be similar then maybe Gentoo has some patch?
Comment by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Friday, 16 February 2007, 06:01 GMT
still valid?

Loading...