FS#50548 - [zenity] build without webkit2gtk
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Emil (xexaxo) - Sunday, 28 August 2016, 17:27 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Tuesday, 24 January 2017, 13:08 GMT
Opened by Emil (xexaxo) - Sunday, 28 August 2016, 17:27 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Tuesday, 24 January 2017, 13:08 GMT
|
Details
Description:
zenity 3.20.0-1 (and earlier versions) depend on webkit2gtk which can be toggled at build time. It's a bit odd for a "Display graphical dialog boxes from shell scripts" tool to pull a bulky web content engine like webkit2gtk as dependency. Can we consider rebuilding with "--disable-webkitgtk" and dropping the dependency ? Fwiw I've been using a 'stripped' version for 6+ months now without any visible side effects. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Jan de Groot (JGC)
Tuesday, 24 January 2017, 13:08 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: disabling webkit2gtk removes functionality. Upstream builds with webkit2gtk by default, so we leave it that way. You can upload a webkit-free version to AUR if you want.
Tuesday, 24 January 2017, 13:08 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: disabling webkit2gtk removes functionality. Upstream builds with webkit2gtk by default, so we leave it that way. You can upload a webkit-free version to AUR if you want.
(23/26) upgrading webkitgtk [######################] 100%
> WARNING: WebKitGTK+ 2.4 is known to have many security vulnerabilities that
will NOT be fixed. Avoid browsing with it.
(24/26) upgrading webkitgtk2 [######################] 100%
> WARNING: WebKitGTK+ 2.4 is known to have many security vulnerabilities that
will NOT be fixed. Avoid browsing with it.
The two programs that I use that depend on webkit2gtk are yelp and zenity. It would be great if the dependency could be removed or rebuilsd the package against webkitgtk (3).
In either case its not Erik's fault - so calling him out is silly.
That aside - has anyone considered my request ? Can attach a patch for the PKGBUILD if people prefer.
I am still confused about the exact nature of these parallel packages, and I agree this is not the place to find out more about that, so I will pose a question on the forums.
In any case thanks for your clarifications.