Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#4893 - Move -beyond kernel from Extra to Current?
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by name withheld (Gullible Jones) - Wednesday, 28 June 2006, 15:01 GMT
Opened by name withheld (Gullible Jones) - Wednesday, 28 June 2006, 15:01 GMT
|
DetailsIMO it would be nice if mkinitramfs and kernel26beyond were moved from Extra to Current. This would allow fans of the -beyond kernel (or people wanting to try it out) to have a somewhat easier time putting it on a system during installation.
|
This task depends upon
Closed by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR)
Wednesday, 27 December 2006, 06:49 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Wednesday, 27 December 2006, 06:49 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Comment by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) -
Wednesday, 28 June 2006, 15:52 GMT
hmm you probably know mkinitramfs is dead, so this will not happen.
Comment by name withheld (Gullible Jones) -
Thursday, 29 June 2006, 02:03 GMT
No I didn't know that... Thanks anyway. Is it possible to move kernel26beyond when mkinitcpio becomes default, or will it stay in Extra?
Comment by James Rayner (iphitus) -
Sunday, 15 October 2006, 07:23 GMT
doubt this will happen, but ill bring it up on the mailing list to see what others think
Comment by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) -
Wednesday, 27 December 2006, 06:49 GMT
current only contains one package for each task. so there's no place for two kernels. if you miss a feature essentuelly in the stock kernel file a bug report for it.