Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#39292 - [doublecmd] build fails

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Joel Teichroeb (klusark) - Monday, 10 March 2014, 15:47 GMT
Last edited by Ike Devolder (BlackEagle) - Sunday, 23 March 2014, 19:51 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages
Status Closed
Assigned To Ike Devolder (BlackEagle)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:
Compiling extractdwrflnfo.lpr
Compiling /build/doublecmd/src/doublecmd-gtk/src/un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(501,20) Hint: Local variable "header" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(510,27) Hint: Local variable "strtab_header" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(520,29) Hint: Local variable "cursec_header" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(527,19) Hint: Local variable "buf" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(577,20) Hint: Local variable "header" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(586,27) Hint: Local variable "strtab_header" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(593,29) Hint: Local variable "cursec_header" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(600,19) Hint: Local variable "buf" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(649,20) Hint: Local variable "header" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(655,28) Hint: Local variable "load_command" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(664,32) Hint: Local variable "segment_header" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(676,36) Hint: Local variable "section_header" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(726,20) Hint: Local variable "header" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(732,28) Hint: Local variable "load_command" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(741,32) Hint: Local variable "segment_header" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(753,36) Hint: Local variable "section_header" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(811,33) Hint: Local variable "sectionNameBuf" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(832,21) Hint: Local variable "dosheader" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(838,24) Hint: Local variable "peheader" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(867,28) Hint: Local variable "coffsec" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(913,28) Hint: Local variable "fileIdentBuf" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(971,28) Hint: Local variable "fileIdentBuf" does not seem to be initialized
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(113,17) Hint: Local type "Elf32_Sword" is not used
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(115,17) Hint: Local type "Elf64_Sword" is not used
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(117,17) Hint: Local type "Elf32_Xword" is not used
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(118,18) Hint: Local type "Elf32_Sxword" is not used
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(120,18) Hint: Local type "Elf64_Sxword" is not used
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(128,19) Hint: Local type "Elf32_Section" is not used
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(129,19) Hint: Local type "Elf64_Section" is not used
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(131,18) Hint: Local type "Elf32_Versym" is not used
un_xtrctdwrflnfo.pp(132,18) Hint: Local type "Elf64_Versym" is not used
Linking extractdwrflnfo
/usr/bin/ld: warning: link.res contains output sections; did you forget -T?
1164 lines compiled, 0.3 sec
33 hint(s) issued
[TCompiler.Compile] end
Extracting Dwarf line info from doublecmd.dbg
Unable to open file "doublecmd.dbg"
strip: 'doublecmd': No such file
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...


Steps to reproduce:
sudo extra-x86_64-build
This task depends upon

Closed by  Ike Devolder (BlackEagle)
Sunday, 23 March 2014, 19:51 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  as stated before: FIXED in the next version 0.5.9, we are not gentoo
Comment by Ike Devolder (BlackEagle) - Saturday, 22 March 2014, 07:35 GMT
will get fixed with the next version, or when a rebuild is needed

binaries are just fine now
Comment by Joel Teichroeb (klusark) - Saturday, 22 March 2014, 15:57 GMT
  • Field changed: Percent Complete (100% → 0%)
I respectfully disagree with the bug being closed. The build currently does fail. There is no ETA from upstream on when there will be a new build. Even if there is no intention of fixing the bug, it is still a valid bug.

Loading...