Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#30146 - If certain packages need to be installed/upgraded before others (as with systemd), pacman should
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by trusktr (trusktr) - Tuesday, 05 June 2012, 18:34 GMT
Last edited by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Tuesday, 05 June 2012, 19:02 GMT
Opened by trusktr (trusktr) - Tuesday, 05 June 2012, 18:34 GMT
Last edited by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Tuesday, 05 June 2012, 19:02 GMT
|
Detailsknow so and do so. For example, it should know what to do with systemd and linux, and output messages appropriate for that scenario.
That'd be awesome! ...much better than having a non-bootable system after upgrade! |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dave Reisner (falconindy)
Tuesday, 05 June 2012, 19:02 GMT
Reason for closing: None
Additional comments about closing: Nothing to do here.
Tuesday, 05 June 2012, 19:02 GMT
Reason for closing: None
Additional comments about closing: Nothing to do here.
Comment by Dave Reisner (falconindy) -
Tuesday, 05 June 2012, 19:01 GMT
Yes, this is what dependencies are for. We post news items when exceptions occur that are beyond the current capabilities of pacman. In this case, we did indeed post a news item. You could have avoided an unbootable system by following said advice of the news item.