Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#2954 - libast-0.6.1 breaks Eterm themes

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Tom Killian (tomk) - Tuesday, 12 July 2005, 07:33 GMT
Last edited by arjan timmerman (blaasvis) - Tuesday, 12 July 2005, 11:11 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category System
Status Closed
Assigned To arjan timmerman (blaasvis)
Architecture not specified
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 0.7 Wombat
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 0%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

libast-0.6.1 was added to extra 3 days ago, and breaks Eterm themes support. The solution is to recompile Eterm against the new libast version.

0.6.1 has been available since 14 Dec 04, by the way.
This task depends upon

Closed by  arjan timmerman (blaasvis)
Thursday, 14 July 2005, 11:33 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by arjan timmerman (blaasvis) - Tuesday, 12 July 2005, 10:55 GMT
seems like the libast update wasn't going smooth..
I am relinking it agains the imlib2 in current/extra atm...
I forgotten about the cvs snapshot i used for e17 ;)
so let's see if eterm we act normal with 0.6.1-2
Comment by Tom Killian (tomk) - Tuesday, 12 July 2005, 13:48 GMT
Yeah, I noticed that eterm cvs build when I was looking into this. I've made my own PKGBUILD for eterm-0.9.3, and it works fine with libast-0.6.1, apart from one problem during the build - it kept looking for Imlib in /opt/e17/lib, which does not exist on my box. I tried various ways to direct it to /usr/lib, but none of them worked, so in the end I copied over the Imlib files, and the build completed.
Comment by arjan timmerman (blaasvis) - Tuesday, 12 July 2005, 14:11 GMT
try rebuild it against the new libast and remove the /opt/e17 junk ;)
That's were my imlib2-cvs was ;)
Comment by Tom Killian (tomk) - Tuesday, 12 July 2005, 15:22 GMT
Perfect - thanks.
Comment by arjan timmerman (blaasvis) - Wednesday, 13 July 2005, 09:06 GMT
so this bug is resolved ??
Comment by Tom Killian (tomk) - Wednesday, 13 July 2005, 10:58 GMT
As far as it concerns libast, yes. I can't recompile the currently available eterm-0.9.2-cvs against it, because the 0.9.2 source code is no longer available at eterm.org, so I've flagged it out-of-date - we should have a proper 0.9.3 package, like my local one.

Loading...