Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#22236 - [logwatch] fails to parse rsyslog entries
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Tim Besard (maleadt) - Tuesday, 28 December 2010, 08:52 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Thursday, 06 January 2011, 16:50 GMT
Opened by Tim Besard (maleadt) - Tuesday, 28 December 2010, 08:52 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Thursday, 06 January 2011, 16:50 GMT
|
DetailsDescription: logwatch fails to parse new-style rsyslog log entries. This can be resolved by making rsyslog spit out old-style messages, or to patch logwatch to support the new messages.
Old style May 28 14:14:46 HOSTNAME ... New style: 2008-05-28T14:14:46.316223-04:00 HOSTNAME ... Red-hat bugzilla entry: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583607 The following patch enables logwatch to parse the new-style messages (tested it myself): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=407611&action=diff Additional info: * package version(s): logwatch at 7.3.6-5, rsyslog at 5.6.0-1 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Sergej Pupykin (sergej)
Thursday, 06 January 2011, 16:50 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.c gi?id=407611&action=diff
applied
Thursday, 06 January 2011, 16:50 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.c gi?id=407611&action=diff
applied