FS#2218 - gtk-doc directory not part of AL philosophy
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Dusty Phillips (Dusty) - Wednesday, 16 February 2005, 17:37 GMT
Last edited by Judd Vinet (judd) - Wednesday, 16 February 2005, 20:30 GMT
Opened by Dusty Phillips (Dusty) - Wednesday, 16 February 2005, 17:37 GMT
Last edited by Judd Vinet (judd) - Wednesday, 16 February 2005, 20:30 GMT
|
Details
Various packages place programmer documentation in the
/usr/share/gtk-doc directory. as with info pages, should
this info not be stripped from these packages?
Discussion here: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=10021&start=30 |
This task depends upon
The gtk-doc things are API docs that are mainly used by developers. The common user doesn't use them and the API docs don't build on tons of packages (the included gtk-doc shit is old stuff that was pregenerated when the upstream maintainer rolled a release and could be very old documentation because it doesn't build always)
Also, the huge KDE/QT stuff that uses make apidox or whatever that says worries me: Do we need the API DOCs, or could we split it in a -doc package?