Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#22115 - go-openoffice-3.2.1.6-2 (current version) requires old icu libs
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Noah Sheppard (nsheppar) - Thursday, 16 December 2010, 01:21 GMT
Last edited by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Thursday, 16 December 2010, 01:38 GMT
Opened by Noah Sheppard (nsheppar) - Thursday, 16 December 2010, 01:21 GMT
Last edited by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Thursday, 16 December 2010, 01:38 GMT
|
DetailsDescription: When I run an openoffice program (e.g. oowriter), I get the following error:
/usr/lib/go-openoffice/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libicuuc.so.44: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I updated icu to 4.6-1 from 4.4.2-1 on 2010-12-11. Therefore, libicuuc.so.44 (or libicule.so.44 which openoffice also needs) no longer exist on my system. It looks like go-openoffice just needs to be recompiled against the new version of icu. Steps to reproduce: Run an openoffice program. Reproducible: 100% |
This task depends upon
Closed by Eric Belanger (Snowman)
Thursday, 16 December 2010, 01:38 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't fix
Additional comments about closing: go-openoffice is no longer in repo
Thursday, 16 December 2010, 01:38 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't fix
Additional comments about closing: go-openoffice is no longer in repo
FS#22114, the previous bug report made as well as http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2010-December/017448.html and follow this http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2010-December/017458.html discussion