Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#20089 - [oprofile] Does not include development libraries
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Ng Oon-Ee (ngoonee) - Tuesday, 06 July 2010, 04:11 GMT
Last edited by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Tuesday, 17 July 2012, 00:01 GMT
Opened by Ng Oon-Ee (ngoonee) - Tuesday, 06 July 2010, 04:11 GMT
Last edited by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Tuesday, 17 July 2012, 00:01 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
oprofile package does not include headers and libraries needed for compiling apps depending on it. Specifically I'm trying to build opxml (binary allowing access to oprofile from an Eclipse plugin), the additional required headers/libraries is specified in [1]. Please indicate if this request is inappropriate, I'll then create an AUR package (oprofile-dev or something) for the purpose. Additional info: * package version(s) 0.9.6-2 * config and/or log files etc. None required [1] - http://wiki.eclipse.org/Linux_Tools_Project/OProfile/User_Guide#Ubuntu_-_Extra_Requirements |
This task depends upon
I suspect that op_bfd.h, one of the development headers, should be included in the oprofile package as well.
It is required by AMD CodeAnalyst when building.