Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#19488 - makepkg doesn't set +r on .INSTALL
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Gavin Bisesi (Daenyth) - Monday, 17 May 2010, 00:45 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Wednesday, 26 May 2010, 10:53 GMT
Opened by Gavin Bisesi (Daenyth) - Monday, 17 May 2010, 00:45 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Wednesday, 26 May 2010, 10:53 GMT
|
DetailsIf you build a package with umask 077, the .INSTALL file is generated without +r. Probably the best way is to just chmod 0644 .INSTALL before compressing.
|
This task depends upon
Closed by Allan McRae (Allan)
Wednesday, 26 May 2010, 10:53 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git /commit/?id=3cd237de
Wednesday, 26 May 2010, 10:53 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git /commit/?id=3cd237de
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) -
Monday, 17 May 2010, 06:19 GMT
Does this matter in any way? The package appears to still install with the correct permissions on the install file.
Comment by Gavin Bisesi (Daenyth) -
Monday, 17 May 2010, 13:06 GMT
Namcap reports it as an error in the package file. If it doesn't matter it probably would be better then to change namcap.
Comment by Dan McGee (toofishes) -
Monday, 17 May 2010, 14:59 GMT
We should probably just chmod any metadata files to 644 as a matter of just being consistent. I don't see this being any sort of release blocker though, and patches are welcome of course.
Comment by Gavin Bisesi (Daenyth) -
Monday, 17 May 2010, 22:09 GMT
I can probably put in a patch for it without too much trouble. Will look at it later... Feel free to assign ticket to me if flyspray lets you.
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) -
Tuesday, 18 May 2010, 11:20 GMT
Can not assigned to you, but is should be a two line patch (one chmod for the .INSTALL file, and one for the .CHANGELOG file).
Comment by Gavin Bisesi (Daenyth) -
Tuesday, 18 May 2010, 12:18 GMT
Yeah, I just have a feeling I'll forget if it isn't. Will try not to. :P
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) -
Saturday, 22 May 2010, 12:31 GMT
patch: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-May/010854.html