Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#19202 - [imagemagick] package includes lots of .la-files
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Stefan Husmann (stefanhusmann) - Wednesday, 21 April 2010, 18:30 GMT
Last edited by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227) - Wednesday, 21 April 2010, 19:15 GMT
Opened by Stefan Husmann (stefanhusmann) - Wednesday, 21 April 2010, 18:30 GMT
Last edited by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227) - Wednesday, 21 April 2010, 19:15 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:[imagemagick] package includes lots of .la-files under
/usr/lib/ImageMagick-6.6.1/modules-Q16. The PKGBUILD deletes .la-files under /usr/lib, but not in the subdirs. find ${pkgdir} -name '*.la' -exec rm {} \; || return 1 at the end of th PKGBUILD would solve this. Additional info: * package version(s) 6.6.1 * config and/or log files etc. Steps to reproduce: pacman -Ql imagemagick| grep \.la |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227)
Wednesday, 21 April 2010, 19:15 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: I agree with Eric. As far as I can tell, in this case they're necessary.
Wednesday, 21 April 2010, 19:15 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: I agree with Eric. As far as I can tell, in this case they're necessary.
Comment by Eric Belanger (Snowman) -
Wednesday, 21 April 2010, 19:08 GMT
Last time I checked, those were required.