FS#18997 - [licenses-2.5-1] there is no BSD license
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by solsTiCe (zebul666) - Thursday, 08 April 2010, 10:30 GMT
Last edited by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Thursday, 08 April 2010, 12:22 GMT
Opened by solsTiCe (zebul666) - Thursday, 08 April 2010, 10:30 GMT
Last edited by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Thursday, 08 April 2010, 12:22 GMT
|
Details
Where is the BSD license ?
There is 150 packages in core/extra/community that expect BSD license to be a rather common license and one to be included in /usr/share/licenses/common because they do not use the custom tag. I found too that the BSD license is a rather common one. So is there a good reason why it's not in licenses package ? from wp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses there is a least 3 licenses. One could expect alias like BSD2 or BSD3. or the other way is to fix the 150 packages ?? |
This task depends upon
Closed by Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
Thursday, 08 April 2010, 12:22 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch _Packaging_Standards#Packaging_Standards
Thursday, 08 April 2010, 12:22 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch _Packaging_Standards#Packaging_Standards
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) -
Thursday, 08 April 2010, 10:57 GMT
If you have a look at the copies of the "BSD" licences included in
these packages, there is a vast range of actual licences.