Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#17370 - [libtool] Is dependency on (gnu) tar necessary?
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Jim Pryor (Profjim) - Friday, 04 December 2009, 00:17 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Saturday, 05 December 2009, 10:00 GMT
Opened by Jim Pryor (Profjim) - Friday, 04 December 2009, 00:17 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Saturday, 05 December 2009, 10:00 GMT
|
DetailsI was wondering why I need three tar handlers on my machine (bsdtar from core/libarchive, aur/pax, core/(gnu)tar). Turns out the only thing depending on (gnu)tar was libarchive, and as I poked around further I couldn't find any evidence that libarchive still does require it. The docs nowhere say so. It builds fine without it, and there's no mention of tar in the configure output. Plus the /usr/lib/libarchive.so.2.7.1 one gets by building without tar looks to have the same dependencies (according to ldd) as the one from core. Now nothing seems broken...does libarchive really still require (gnu)tar after all? bsdtar which we need for pacman wouldn't be enough?
* package version(s): core/libarchive 2.7.1-1 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Allan McRae (Allan)
Saturday, 05 December 2009, 10:00 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: FS#10612
Saturday, 05 December 2009, 10:00 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing:
FS#10612