Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#10417 - Request 8+ core support in kernel 2.6.25
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Lyle S (DeltaXFX) - Wednesday, 14 May 2008, 14:24 GMT
Last edited by Greg (dolby) - Saturday, 26 July 2008, 05:48 GMT
Opened by Lyle S (DeltaXFX) - Wednesday, 14 May 2008, 14:24 GMT
Last edited by Greg (dolby) - Saturday, 26 July 2008, 05:48 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Request 8+ core support in kernel 2.6.25. I used the latest 2.6.25 out of testing today and there was still only 4 core support. ref: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=47390 Additional info: * package version(s) : 2v6v25 * config and/or log files etc: NA Steps to reproduce: NA |
This task depends upon
Closed by Greg (dolby)
Saturday, 26 July 2008, 05:48 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Kernel 2.6.26 has now support for 16.
Saturday, 26 July 2008, 05:48 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Kernel 2.6.26 has now support for 16.
Comment by Thomas Bächler (brain0) -
Wednesday, 14 May 2008, 15:12 GMT
I knew I forgot something. I think we decided on 16 CPUs maximum.
Comment by Thomas Bächler (brain0) -
Friday, 16 May 2008, 12:08 GMT
Unfortunately, this change requires a rebuild of all external modules, so I would like to wait until the next major update (2.6.26) for this change. You'd have to build your own kernels for 2.6.25 then.