Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#9989 - miro patch for gcc 4.3

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Qin Zhu (zhuqin) - Thursday, 27 March 2008, 23:02 GMT
Last edited by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Friday, 09 May 2008, 21:45 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 1.5.1
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 1
Private No

Details

The latest miro cannot be built with gcc 4.3,
here is a patch from http://bugzilla.pculture.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9691
   PKGBUILD (0.9 KiB)
   gcc43.patch (1.9 KiB)
This task depends upon

Closed by  Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
Friday, 09 May 2008, 21:45 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  I added a patch before I saw this one, sorry:
http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/mi ro/trunk/
Comment by Qin Zhu (zhuqin) - Friday, 04 April 2008, 05:37 GMT
  • Field changed: Percent Complete (100% → 0%)
I'm sorry, but would you please check this again? It does work for me.
Comment by Qin Zhu (zhuqin) - Friday, 04 April 2008, 05:49 GMT
Thanks for reopening.
Comment by Qin Zhu (zhuqin) - Wednesday, 23 April 2008, 05:27 GMT
update: this patch works well with latest miro 1.2.3.
Comment by Greg (dolby) - Monday, 05 May 2008, 23:20 GMT
First of all you reported this in the wrong section. Thats why it was closed.
Now regarding your report. Archlinux is a binary distribution. The package provided by the Archlinux repos works. IMO instead of making this report you should have flagged the package out of date, providing a link to the gcc-4.3 patch in the comments. Bug reports like this are useless in binary distribution's bug tracker. They clearly belong to the applications one.
Comment by Qin Zhu (zhuqin) - Tuesday, 06 May 2008, 02:08 GMT
It was flagged out of date by someone else, so...

Loading...