Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#9977 - adding sshfs to updatedb.conf
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Danny Arnold (despairblue) - Wednesday, 26 March 2008, 23:15 GMT
Last edited by James Rayner (iphitus) - Saturday, 24 May 2008, 00:34 GMT
Opened by Danny Arnold (despairblue) - Wednesday, 26 March 2008, 23:15 GMT
Last edited by James Rayner (iphitus) - Saturday, 24 May 2008, 00:34 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
This is just a small issue I encountered. The current packaged updatedb.conf (PKG: mlocate) contains the following line: ________________________________ PRUNEFS="nfs smbfs ncpfs afs proc smbfs autofs auto iso9660 coda ftpfs cifs" ________________________________ It does contain smbfs twice, which is not a problem, just doesn't look nice, and I suggest adding sshfs to the list, because it is widely used and generally one does not want to index sshfs mounts. |
This task depends upon
Closed by James Rayner (iphitus)
Saturday, 24 May 2008, 00:34 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: mlocate-0.20-2 in [testing]
Saturday, 24 May 2008, 00:34 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: mlocate-0.20-2 in [testing]
I'll quote the important part here:
---
I used this in new rlocate-utils package soon to be uploaded to community:
PRUNEFS="nfs nfs4 smbfs cifs ncpfs afs proc autofs auto iso9660 coda ftpfs sshfs shfs"
I wonder if sysfs is needed here as well, what do you think?
---