Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#9975 - Mirror sync related bugreports here
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Gerhard Brauer (GerBra) - Wednesday, 26 March 2008, 13:56 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Thursday, 24 July 2008, 03:30 GMT
Opened by Gerhard Brauer (GerBra) - Wednesday, 26 March 2008, 13:56 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Thursday, 24 July 2008, 03:30 GMT
|
DetailsHi,
if i see a mirror problem which i thought its important enough to inform others than i opened a bugreport here in pacman section as: Support request, Subject [Mirror-sync]. In most tickets only myself add comments or request them for closure when they be solved. Now my idea is: I could use our own bugtracker on archlinux.de to create a tracker for such sync, downtime problems which are not related to pacman, you admins or archlinux side. So we could reduce the "noise" here (every report goes to Aarons mailbox, sometimes also to Roman). But we still have public available references (tickets) which i include in the mirror status side and which could be notified in forums etc. This bugtracker i think should not be open for all, only for me and mostly in cunjunction with the mirror status side. Of cource, if i notice things which need admin reaction (rsync changes, url changes,...) then i open a ticket accessorily here. I've emailed with Roman a little about that. What is your opinion? Other opportunities could be: a) i/we do it as current b) We make a category her in pacman section named mirror to cut it of from normal pacman bugreports c) ??? Roman or other: maybe you could assign the other guys who are involved in mirror things? |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dan McGee (toofishes)
Thursday, 24 July 2008, 03:30 GMT
Reason for closing: None
Additional comments about closing: Closing per request.
Thursday, 24 July 2008, 03:30 GMT
Reason for closing: None
Additional comments about closing: Closing per request.
I would also think keeping all Arch Linux bug reports on this site would be good- trying to 'reduce noise' is a pretty weird reason to not track relevant issues here. people can very easily set up a mail filter if it really bugs them.
Sounds good for me. Maybe we find a category name which could not only be used for mirror stuff(i have no idea).
And maybe an new Task Type, perhaps Info or so.
At the moment mirror related reports are only quite a few, and cause i'm checking them i assume we won't have so
massive reports like ~2 months ago.
- No bugreports on mirror sync problems, only when there is something to do for achlinux admins.
- Most sync problems i could solve by email contacts.
- I'll make a thread on bbs.archlinux.org where i could make announces about temporary mirror problems.
So from my side there is no need for new feature, we could close this request.