Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#9966 - NetworkManager service does not autostart hal but does dbus and dhcdbd
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by nothlit (nothlit) - Wednesday, 26 March 2008, 06:29 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Friday, 14 November 2008, 22:36 GMT
Opened by nothlit (nothlit) - Wednesday, 26 March 2008, 06:29 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Friday, 14 November 2008, 22:36 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
/etc/rc.d/networkmanager start starts dbus and dhcdbd if not running already, but not hal which it needs to find devices. hal will start dbus and acpid on its own afaik Additional info: * package version(s) * config and/or log files etc. Steps to reproduce: |
This task depends upon
Closed by Jan de Groot (JGC)
Friday, 14 November 2008, 22:36 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Fixed in testing. This has been implemented upstream :)
Friday, 14 November 2008, 22:36 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Fixed in testing. This has been implemented upstream :)
As long as it is explicitly documented to start hal before networkmanager on the related wiki page : http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/NetworkManager, this is not a bug, but a feature request.
I am requesting a closure and let the developer (Jan ?) decide whether he wants to turn this into a feature request or definitely close this request.
In case somebody is interested in my opinion (who knows ;-) ) : as long as initscripts are not made to handle dependencies I do not think this will be a good think to have this kind of feature : daemon A automatically starts daemon b and c ... I easily understand some exceptions such HAL starting DBUS and thus avoiding a big amount of daemons in the DAEMONS variable in rc.conf. But this should be an exception as long as daemons dependencies are not part of the initscript architecture.
If someone wants to implement dependencies, it should be implemented properly, not ad hoc.