Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#9745 - magickthumbnail cannot handle directories with WHITESPCAEs
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Ning Bao (phabulosa) - Sunday, 02 March 2008, 16:59 GMT
Last edited by dtw (dibblethewrecker) - Monday, 09 March 2009, 18:06 GMT
Opened by Ning Bao (phabulosa) - Sunday, 02 March 2008, 16:59 GMT
Last edited by dtw (dibblethewrecker) - Monday, 09 March 2009, 18:06 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
If there are WHITESPCAES in a directory name, magickthumbnail cannot produce thumbnails for image files within that directory Additional info: * package version(s) rox 2.7.1-1 magickthumbnail 1.0-1 * config and/or log files etc. Steps to reproduce: 1. install both rox and magickthumbnail 2. run /usr/bin/magickthumbnail and select the supported file types 3. place some jpg files in a directory 4. Play a renaming game for the directory name 5. Restart a new rox-filer session if nessary to see the differece |
This task depends upon
Closed by dtw (dibblethewrecker)
Monday, 09 March 2009, 18:06 GMT
Reason for closing: Upstream
Additional comments about closing: This is an upstream bug for a very old and unmaintained application. We can't realistically fix such issues.
You can either live with or I can remove the pkg completely. That's about it! Sorry.
Monday, 09 March 2009, 18:06 GMT
Reason for closing: Upstream
Additional comments about closing: This is an upstream bug for a very old and unmaintained application. We can't realistically fix such issues.
You can either live with or I can remove the pkg completely. That's about it! Sorry.
Comment by Gavin Bisesi (Daenyth) -
Thursday, 21 August 2008, 01:11 GMT
Perhaps you should report this upstream?
Comment by Gavin Bisesi (Daenyth) -
Wednesday, 03 September 2008, 18:40 GMT
Is this still an issue?
Comment by Ning Bao (phabulosa) -
Thursday, 02 October 2008, 05:01 GMT
I have not been using Rox for quite some time, but I just checked and the same issue is still unsolved
Comment by Gavin Bisesi (Daenyth) -
Wednesday, 05 November 2008, 17:46 GMT
Has this been reported upstream?