Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#9721 - searching within an email in evolution will only search backwards
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by robin wood (dninja) - Friday, 29 February 2008, 15:57 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Tuesday, 06 May 2008, 11:52 GMT
Opened by robin wood (dninja) - Friday, 29 February 2008, 15:57 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Tuesday, 06 May 2008, 11:52 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
When searching within mail in evolution, whether it is in the main window or the mail is in its own window, only the previous button works, next doesn't. This means I can only search backwards through mails. Additional info: * package version(s) - evolution 2.12.3 * config and/or log files etc. - standard install, nothing special Steps to reproduce: does it every time, go to the menu and select "find in message" then enter a phrase and click Next or Previous. Clicking Next the first time identifies all the matches, fills in the number of matches at the bottom and does the colour highlighting but then won't actually step through the results. Previous steps through fine but, as it should, backwards. |
This task depends upon
Evolution 2.22.1 is available in the repo.
Do you still have this issue with the new version ?
Did you check on Gnome's bug tracker to see if this issue is Evolution related or Arch related ?
Thank you very much for those information.
I did have a search around and couldn't find any reference to it anywhere else so it could have been Arch specific or just no one else noticed it.
I think the searching interface still doesn't work quite right but that is usability rather than a bug so this can be closed.