Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#9478 - can't remove a package when a group of the same name is installed
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Xavier (shining) - Wednesday, 06 February 2008, 19:09 GMT
Last edited by Xavier (shining) - Thursday, 24 July 2008, 09:23 GMT
Opened by Xavier (shining) - Wednesday, 06 February 2008, 19:09 GMT
Last edited by Xavier (shining) - Thursday, 24 July 2008, 09:23 GMT
|
DetailsSummary and Info:
It is possible to have both a package and a group of the same name installed. For example it happened with xorg > sudo pacman -Qg xorg xorg xf86-input-keyboard xorg xf86-input-mouse xorg xf86-video-vesa xorg xorg-server xorg xorg-xinit xorg xterm > sudo pacman -Q xorg xorg 11R7.0-1 > sudo LANG=C pacman -R xorg :: group xorg: xf86-input-keyboard xf86-input-mouse xf86-video-vesa xorg-server xorg-xinit xterm Remove whole content? [Y/n] We would need a way to choose if we want to remove the package or the group. For example, pacman -Rg would only try to remove the group. And pacman -R would try to remove the package first, and if not found, the group. See also : http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=303403#p303403 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Xavier (shining)
Thursday, 24 July 2008, 09:23 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: This bug report is no longer valid in 3.2 where the behavior is reversed. And anyway, it is not a big deal.
Thursday, 24 July 2008, 09:23 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: This bug report is no longer valid in 3.2 where the behavior is reversed. And anyway, it is not a big deal.
What about target-type modifiers?
With getopt() I have no better idea than the following:
# pacman -R mc -g gnome,devel -p xorg -g multimedia-plugins
[-g <target> indicates group, -p indicates package etc.].
/I don't like this syntax, but I like the idea.../
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-July/012315.html
What this does is just reversing the problem. You can't remove a group when a package of the same name is installed.
But probably that is nicer, since it's easier to just remove and reinstall one package than a whole group (or worse, a subset of a group).
So I would just close this, since we can't find a nice way to explicitly specify whether we want to remove a group or a package,
and last Nagy's patch has made this problem less annoying anyway.
I still vote for dividing group and literal remove (and install).
offtopic: I've just tried -Qqg, I'm pretty sure that we should omit group names here to ease up these "shell hacks": pacman -R `pacman -Qqg xorg`.
Do you mean dividing them in pacman interface (in the frontend), or in the code (maybe in the backend?) or both?
Anyway, feel free to start working on this and/or opening the discussion on the ML
> I've just tried -Qqg, I'm pretty sure that we should omit group names here to ease up these "shell hacks": pacman -R `pacman -Qqg xorg`.
The quiet flag is currently not used in -Qg output, feel free to provide a patch implementing that.