Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#9370 - Pacman 3.1.1-1: directory permissions differ for new package
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by name withheld (Gullible Jones) - Monday, 28 January 2008, 01:38 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Sunday, 02 March 2008, 00:21 GMT
Opened by name withheld (Gullible Jones) - Monday, 28 January 2008, 01:38 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Sunday, 02 March 2008, 00:21 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
On upgrading to the latest version of pacman, I was presented with this message: warning: directory permissions differ on var/cache/ filesystem: 777 package: 755 warning: directory permissions differ on var/cache/pacman/ filesystem: 777 package: 755 Since no bugfix involving permissions was mentioned in CVS, and permissions issues can produce major security holes, I'm going to assume this is a problem. Additional info: * pacman 3.1.1-1 Steps to reproduce: Upgrade from pacman 3.1.0 to 3.1.1-1. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dan McGee (toofishes)
Sunday, 02 March 2008, 00:21 GMT
Reason for closing: Works for me
Additional comments about closing: Please open a new bug if you can answer my requests in the last comment.
Sunday, 02 March 2008, 00:21 GMT
Reason for closing: Works for me
Additional comments about closing: Please open a new bug if you can answer my requests in the last comment.
I changed the permissions on /var/cache to what they should have been... But at any rate, deleting /var/cache/pacman and installing packages failed to produce the message again. I think this is a problem with the Archboot installer.
I just recently used the Arch installer on my Eee and didn't notice this issue, and all permissions seem to be OK right now. If you don't mind, I'd like to close this- something went wrong somewhere, but we don't have enough information here to track it down. If you do have info and can provide exact directions to reproduce (or fix it), then we can start another ticket for that.