Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Reporting_Bug_Guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in Unsupported. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#9026 - [libvisual-bmp] deprecated / depends on libvisual=0.2.0

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Alexander Baldeck (kth5) - Thursday, 27 December 2007, 21:37 GMT
Last edited by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Friday, 12 December 2008, 23:44 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Damir Perisa (damir.perisa)
Eric Belanger (Snowman)
Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
Allan McRae (Allan)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 2007.08-2
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:
libvisual-bmp requires libvisual 0.2.0 on build and runtime

Either drop libvisual-bmp, drop bmp alover as bmpx may take its place (?) or get a newer libvisual-bmp that works with our currentl libvisual 0.4.0. The site of libvisual-bmp seems to be crippled to death.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Eric Belanger (Snowman)
Friday, 12 December 2008, 23:44 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  libvisual-bmp was removed from repo
Comment by Damir Perisa (damir.perisa) - Saturday, 29 December 2007, 12:07 GMT
dropping libvisual-bmp is the only option i see, since i cannot find any 0.4.0 compatible version (0.2.0->0.4.0 was an api change in libvisual)
Comment by Greg (dolby) - Sunday, 04 May 2008, 19:48 GMT
droping the package seems like the only solution. by the way homepage has moved to http://localhost.nl/~synap/libvisual/
Comment by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Sunday, 07 December 2008, 02:17 GMT
libvisual-bmp is orphaned and no package use it. We could just remove it as it's just a plugin. Any opinion?
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) - Friday, 12 December 2008, 14:29 GMT
Go for it. Removing seems the best solution here.
Comment by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Friday, 12 December 2008, 16:35 GMT
I vote for removal as well

Loading...