Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#8690 - perl-datetime-format-strptime & perl-datetime-format-mail : bad dependency version

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Sunday, 18 November 2007, 06:46 GMT
Last edited by Francois Charette (Firmicus) - Friday, 07 March 2008, 00:27 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category
Status Closed
Assigned To Eric Belanger (Snowman)
Francois Charette (Firmicus)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

The version of the perl-datetime depends must be changed. Removing the last two digits will probably fix it. Pacman has problems comparing the version because perl-datetime has currently only 2 digits in its version.

Roman: Also, assign this task to Firmicus in case he has time.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Francois Charette (Firmicus)
Friday, 07 March 2008, 00:27 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Mick (lunix) - Friday, 29 February 2008, 10:10 GMT
Hi, Is there a workaround for this ?
I have just revived an old retired box and issued a pacman -Syu.
This updated pacman but now when I run a pacman -Syu I get the following problem:
resolving dependencies...
error: cannot resolve "perl-datetime>=0.1705", a dependency of "perl-datetime-format-mail"
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: perl-datetime-format-mail: requires perl-datetime>=0.1705

I have removed both perl-datetime & perl-datetime-format-mail and built them from aur and get the same problem.

Linux scrappy 2.6.20-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Apr 15 11:57:33 CEST 2007 i686 Pentium III (Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

Comment by Francois Charette (Firmicus) - Friday, 29 February 2008, 13:12 GMT
Mmm... I thought I had fixed this long ago. Actually it is in my local copy of the cvs tree, but obviously this change was not commited. I'll do it now.

Loading...