Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#8536 - texlive and achemso
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Martin (dante) - Tuesday, 06 November 2007, 21:47 GMT
Last edited by Francois Charette (Firmicus) - Saturday, 22 December 2007, 09:47 GMT
Opened by Martin (dante) - Tuesday, 06 November 2007, 21:47 GMT
Last edited by Francois Charette (Firmicus) - Saturday, 22 December 2007, 09:47 GMT
|
DetailsThere is a bug in bibtex and achemso.bst from "texlive-latexextra 2007.1-2". When using a new version from svn, everything is OK.
Here is the bibtex error output: This is BibTeX, Version 0.99c (Web2C 7.5.6) The top-level auxiliary file: ocf.aux The style file: achemso.bst Database file #1: ocf.bib `title' is a missing field, not a string, for entry mitch while executing---line 1120 of file achemso.bst (There was 1 error message) |
This task depends upon
Closed by Francois Charette (Firmicus)
Saturday, 22 December 2007, 09:47 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Done long ago but had forgotten to update :/
Now fixed in 2007.2-1
Saturday, 22 December 2007, 09:47 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Done long ago but had forgotten to update :/
Now fixed in 2007.2-1
Comment by Francois Charette (Firmicus) -
Wednesday, 07 November 2007, 10:17 GMT
Before I try to patch this, can you confirm that the problem is with file achemso.bst only?
Comment by Martin (dante) -
Thursday, 08 November 2007, 08:55 GMT
I copied the new achemso.bst file to my folder containing the tex file and everything worked again. S I think the failure is only in this file. Other bibtex style, I tested, worked without problems.
Comment by Francois Charette (Firmicus) -
Thursday, 08 November 2007, 09:20 GMT
OK thanks, I'll patch this and update texlive-latexextra soon.