Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#8391 - aufs wrong install path? Also depends problem
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Michael Towers (gradgrind) - Tuesday, 23 October 2007, 18:08 GMT
Last edited by Paul Mattal (paul) - Tuesday, 27 November 2007, 14:51 GMT
Opened by Michael Towers (gradgrind) - Tuesday, 23 October 2007, 18:08 GMT
Last edited by Paul Mattal (paul) - Tuesday, 27 November 2007, 14:51 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
I'm delighted to see aufs has made it into extra, but the module is being installed in /lib/modules/2.6.23-ARCH/fs/aufs (In my opinion) it should be /lib/modules/2.6.23-ARCH/kernel/fs/aufs Also I would be very grateful if the dependency on aufs-utils could be removed, as it is not actually a dependency - aufs works fine without it. Additional info: * package version(s) 20071017-3 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Paul Mattal (paul)
Tuesday, 27 November 2007, 14:51 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: This is the standard way of packaging modules in Arch:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Kern el_Module_Package_Guidelines
Tuesday, 27 November 2007, 14:51 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: This is the standard way of packaging modules in Arch:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Kern el_Module_Package_Guidelines
/lib/modules/2.6.23-ARCH/fs/aufs
Next time I will try to follow the crustimoney proseedcake:
1) Think
2) Sleep on it
3) If unsure, ask on the mailing list
4) Post a bug report
But even if the package is otherwise fine it would still be nice to have the dependency on aufs-utils removed.