Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#827 - installer: network configuration
|
Detailsi know it has been said many times that arch is a "technical" distro with no hardware detection upon install, however...
_imho_, it would be nice if the user could only easily setup (read: not having to edit config files) the internet connection when installing arch. then the user could acces the wiki/forum/irc channel to get the rest (sound, video, etc.) working. |
This task depends upon
Arch Linux is certifiably wizard-free. Low in fat, high in fibre. One can think of the initial network configuration as a sort of competency barrier. If the user has difficulty using nano or vi to edit a text file, then they should be reconsidering Arch Linux as their distro of choice.
We are not a user-friendly distro. We are a solid workhorse distro that a competent user will find very appealing. I do not believe that we can be both user-friendly and simple/effective/efficient to experienced linux users. From my experience, most (if not all) distros are one or the other, and if they are both (such as Fedora tries to be) then they sacrifice the simplistic implementations that Arch embraces.