Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#80305 - [kitty] Startup performance significantly worse than official binary
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Ricardo (MithicSpirit) - Monday, 20 November 2023, 20:47 GMT
Last edited by Toolybird (Toolybird) - Tuesday, 21 November 2023, 02:52 GMT
Opened by Ricardo (MithicSpirit) - Monday, 20 November 2023, 20:47 GMT
Last edited by Toolybird (Toolybird) - Tuesday, 21 November 2023, 02:52 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
When executing `kitty`, the time it takes for it to display a window is about 0.5 s longer than on the official binary distributed by the project, which is roughly a 3x increase in startup time. Additional info: * package version 0.31.0-1 * can be reproduced without a config file * discussed upstream at https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty/issues/6834 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Toolybird (Toolybird)
Tuesday, 21 November 2023, 02:52 GMT
Reason for closing: Works for me
Tuesday, 21 November 2023, 02:52 GMT
Reason for closing: Works for me
FWIW, it starts up like lightning here. Probably best if you take this to the Arch support channels (Forum/IRC/etc) to see if anyone can help troubleshoot your system.
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines