Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#79370 - [lib32-spirv-tools] Exists in multiple places
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Mantas Mikulėnas (grawity) - Monday, 14 August 2023, 05:31 GMT
Last edited by Toolybird (Toolybird) - Tuesday, 15 August 2023, 21:58 GMT
Opened by Mantas Mikulėnas (grawity) - Monday, 14 August 2023, 05:31 GMT
Last edited by Toolybird (Toolybird) - Tuesday, 15 August 2023, 21:58 GMT
|
Detailslib32-spirv-tools 2022.4 has been added to multilib recently, but version 2023.2 still exists in AUR. It's unclear why the new package is an older version, or why the AUR package hasn't been removed as usually happens. (Should I allow my AUR helper to upgrade it? I assume I shouldn't.)
|
This task depends upon
Closed by Toolybird (Toolybird)
Tuesday, 15 August 2023, 21:58 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: AUR issue. See comments.
Tuesday, 15 August 2023, 21:58 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: AUR issue. See comments.
Maybe just file an AUR deletion request? PM notified.
> It's unclear why the new package is an older version
Obviously to stay in line with extra/spirv-tools.
I can't request deletion as I was not the one who added the equivalent package to [multilib] and I don't know if there was a reason for keeping it in AUR. (Hence this post...)
??? Anyone can request deletion if there is good enough reason (which clearly there is here). If you don't do it then I'm sure someone will eventually..