Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#79160 - [graphicsmagick] Add libGraphicsMagick++-Q16.so.12

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by bbhtt (bbhtt) - Thursday, 20 July 2023, 15:35 GMT
Last edited by Caleb Maclennan (alerque) - Tuesday, 15 August 2023, 02:56 GMT
Task Type Feature Request
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Caleb Maclennan (alerque)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:


Additional info:
* package version(s) 1.3.40-3
* config and/or log files etc. NA
* link to upstream bug report, if any NA

Steps to reproduce:

The package here is missing `libGraphicsMagick++-Q16.so.12` which is packaged by other distributions [1], [2] and applications might depend on it.

Afaik, the following build args will build that library:


```
--enable-quantum-library-names
--with-quantum-depth=16
--with-magick_plus_plus
```

[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/GraphicsMagick/blob/rawhide/f/GraphicsMagick.spec#_341

[2] https://sources.debian.org/src/graphicsmagick/1.4%2Breally1.3.40-4/debian/rules/#L73
This task depends upon

Closed by  Caleb Maclennan (alerque)
Tuesday, 15 August 2023, 02:56 GMT
Reason for closing:  Not a bug
Comment by Caleb Maclennan (alerque) - Tuesday, 15 August 2023, 02:54 GMT
It turns out I'm not so sure about this... those options don't add a missing library they just rename the one we have. I think we already have it packaged, just without the extra quantum naming scheme, whatever that is for. Applications that depend on a library should be built against the distribution that has the library. I don't want to change the naming scheme arbitrarily. If there is some reason this should change feel free to re-open on post a follow up issue, but as is I don't see a reason to break things that are already compiled against what we have!

Loading...