Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#79105 - [adlplug] FTBFS (checksum mismatch)

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Levi Zim (kxxt) - Friday, 14 July 2023, 13:34 GMT
Last edited by Jelle van der Waa (jelly) - Saturday, 02 September 2023, 09:47 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To David Runge (dvzrv)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:

==> Validating source files with sha512sums...
ADLplug-1.0.2.tar.xz ... Passed
adlplug-1.0.1-gcc9.patch ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

Additional info:
* package version(s) 1.0.2-9
* patch attached
   fix.patch (1 KiB)
This task depends upon

Closed by  Jelle van der Waa (jelly)
Saturday, 02 September 2023, 09:47 GMT
Reason for closing:  Works for me
Additional comments about closing:  adlplug-1.0.1-gcc9.patch ... Passed

Needs a global RFC.
Comment by Toolybird (Toolybird) - Friday, 14 July 2023, 21:54 GMT
So, who would like to write the RFC? [1]

[1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/79096#comment219527
Comment by Levi Zim (kxxt) - Monday, 31 July 2023, 08:25 GMT
Similar to https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/79096, it seems that the checksum mismatch no longer happens. But this kind of issues might still happen in the future.
Comment by Toolybird (Toolybird) - Monday, 31 July 2023, 08:52 GMT
> But this kind of issues might still happen in the future

Yes, in my experience it really is pot luck (with GitHub). One day the length of the commit SHA is different, then maybe a day or 2 later, it's back to what it was originally. We REALLY need to sort something out...because relying on ever-changing patch checksums is just not viable.

Any thoughts @dvzrv?

Loading...