Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#78916 - [exim] Match Arch's path for the saslauthd socket
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Giovanni Bottaro (bgiovanni) - Wednesday, 28 June 2023, 18:07 GMT
Last edited by Buggy McBugFace (bugbot) - Saturday, 25 November 2023, 20:18 GMT
Opened by Giovanni Bottaro (bgiovanni) - Wednesday, 28 June 2023, 18:07 GMT
Last edited by Buggy McBugFace (bugbot) - Saturday, 25 November 2023, 20:18 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
It seems like the saslauthd socket path might be hardcoded at build time and can't be subsequently changed at runtime. Currently Arch has the saslauthd socket path option commented out in the relevant build configuration file. The attached patch adds the saslauthd socket path and matches it with the default one used by Arch's saslauthd package. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Buggy McBugFace (bugbot)
Saturday, 25 November 2023, 20:18 GMT
Reason for closing: Moved
Additional comments about closing: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/p ackaging/packages/exim/issues/4
Saturday, 25 November 2023, 20:18 GMT
Reason for closing: Moved
Additional comments about closing: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/p ackaging/packages/exim/issues/4
Thank you for the tip!
About cyrus-sasl, I see that in the tmpfiles.conf file they're creating the saslauthd folder in /run, however in the PKGBUILD they're handing to ./configure '--with-saslauthd=/var/run/saslauthd'. So yes, I think that for consistency's sake it should be '--with-saslauthd=/run/saslauthd' instead.
EDIT: Oh, I see it's already an open issue. ( https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78402)