Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#7799 - archlinux.org look on safari3
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Alessio Bolognino (mOLOk) - Sunday, 12 August 2007, 16:08 GMT
Last edited by eliott (cactus) - Saturday, 15 September 2007, 05:12 GMT
Opened by Alessio Bolognino (mOLOk) - Sunday, 12 August 2007, 16:08 GMT
Last edited by eliott (cactus) - Saturday, 15 September 2007, 05:12 GMT
|
Detailsarchlinux.org is bad rendered by safari3, it uses webkit engine that shouldn't be "OMG so non-standard"
(screenshot attached) |
This task depends upon
Closed by eliott (cactus)
Saturday, 15 September 2007, 05:12 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: I think I fixed this.
Reopen ticket if needed.
Saturday, 15 September 2007, 05:12 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: I think I fixed this.
Reopen ticket if needed.
al.org.png
If you can suggest any html/css changes to the pages in question, I would be happy to take a look.
;)
Based on that validation output..it seems like there is just a single extra tr element in there.
I will see if I can find it in the backend.
Now the site validates.
It was just a single <tr> in there. Weird.
Did it help the safari rendering at all?
I got a hold of a mac for a few minutes. It is weird that half the times you refresh, it looks fine, and the other half, it comes out goofy with the title below the logo.
Anyway, hopefully this change helps the browser eliminate some..ambiguity.