Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#77130 - [dbus-broker] Mark as provides: dbus?
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Steve M (smmalis37) - Sunday, 15 January 2023, 00:27 GMT
Last edited by Buggy McBugFace (bugbot) - Saturday, 25 November 2023, 20:27 GMT
Opened by Steve M (smmalis37) - Sunday, 15 January 2023, 00:27 GMT
Last edited by Buggy McBugFace (bugbot) - Saturday, 25 November 2023, 20:27 GMT
|
DetailsSince dbus-broker aims to be a drop-in compatible replacement for the standard dbus, could its package be marked as providing dbus? That would allow users to remove dbus from the system (without using -Rdd or something), preventing any potential conflicts from having both accidentally running at the same time.
|
This task depends upon
Closed by Buggy McBugFace (bugbot)
Saturday, 25 November 2023, 20:27 GMT
Reason for closing: Moved
Additional comments about closing: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/p ackaging/packages/dbus-broker/issues/1
Saturday, 25 November 2023, 20:27 GMT
Reason for closing: Moved
Additional comments about closing: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/p ackaging/packages/dbus-broker/issues/1

dbus package would need a new subpackage dbus-libs since a lot of stuff depend on libdbus.