FS#77130 - [dbus-broker] Mark as provides: dbus?
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Steve M (smmalis37) - Sunday, 15 January 2023, 00:27 GMT
Last edited by Buggy McBugFace (bugbot) - Saturday, 25 November 2023, 20:27 GMT
Opened by Steve M (smmalis37) - Sunday, 15 January 2023, 00:27 GMT
Last edited by Buggy McBugFace (bugbot) - Saturday, 25 November 2023, 20:27 GMT
|
Details
Since dbus-broker aims to be a drop-in compatible
replacement for the standard dbus, could its package be
marked as providing dbus? That would allow users to remove
dbus from the system (without using -Rdd or something),
preventing any potential conflicts from having both
accidentally running at the same time.
|
This task depends upon
Closed by Buggy McBugFace (bugbot)
Saturday, 25 November 2023, 20:27 GMT
Reason for closing: Moved
Additional comments about closing: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/p ackaging/packages/dbus-broker/issues/1
Saturday, 25 November 2023, 20:27 GMT
Reason for closing: Moved
Additional comments about closing: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/p ackaging/packages/dbus-broker/issues/1
Comment by
Marcos Mello (marcosfrm) - Monday,
28 August 2023, 12:39 GMT
dbus package would need a new subpackage dbus-libs since a lot of
stuff depend on libdbus.