FS#7686 - iwl3945 doesn't work with network profiles for some reason
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Christ Schlacta (aarcane) - Friday, 27 July 2007, 02:04 GMT
Last edited by James Rayner (iphitus) - Friday, 23 May 2008, 12:53 GMT
Opened by Christ Schlacta (aarcane) - Friday, 27 July 2007, 02:04 GMT
Last edited by James Rayner (iphitus) - Friday, 23 May 2008, 12:53 GMT
|
Details
Description:
init scripts network profiles fails to function with my network card using the iwl3945 driver. Additional info: * package version(s) * config and/or log files etc. initscripts 0.8-12 0c:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection (rev 02) Steps to reproduce: Configure wifi settings in profile, start network. Additional Information: I've written this init script which will work around the problem, but it's quite the kludgy hack. the actual steps it performs are only slightly different from network profiles, but it works for some reason |
This task depends upon
mywifi
I can't tell what your script might do that netcfg wouldn't, except call iwconfig twice. I never tried WEP with the driver, as it is a security-nightmare and shouldn't be used by anyone for anything.
I think the reason my script works is all the times I call iwconfig, all the time I sleep, and the fact that I bring the device up many times instead of just one. it took me 4 hours to tweak the order of the steps I perform to get the script to actually reliably bring the wlan up, and I can't even switch between wlans :-S
I think the reason my script works is all the times I call iwconfig, all the time I sleep, and the fact that I bring the device up many times instead of just one. it took me 4 hours to tweak the order of the steps I perform to get the script to actually reliably bring the wlan up, and I can't even switch between wlans :-S
After some time with you on irc, mr.Thomas, It works now using ipw instead of iwl. this seems like less of a hack, as it works well.
The only thing I can say more is that I think this bug should not be closed until it works as intended with iwl, but that means this should be forwarded to upstream.
After some time with you on irc, mr.Thomas, It works now using ipw instead of iwl. this seems like less of a hack, as it works well.
The only thing I can say more is that I think this bug should not be closed until it works as intended with iwl, but that means this should be forwarded to upstream.