Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#75663 - [tea] unlicensed code in statically linked dependency
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Imre Jonk (imrejonk) - Monday, 22 August 2022, 05:01 GMT
Last edited by George Rawlinson (rawlinsong) - Monday, 22 August 2022, 10:01 GMT
Opened by Imre Jonk (imrejonk) - Monday, 22 August 2022, 05:01 GMT
Last edited by George Rawlinson (rawlinsong) - Monday, 22 August 2022, 10:01 GMT
|
Detailsunidiff-comments, one of the statically linked Go dependencies of the 'tea' program, has not been released by its author under a license that allows free redistribution. We therefore cannot redistribute the 'tea' package.
See also: https://artemis.sh/2022/08/21/this-program-is-illegally-packaged-in-14-distributions.html |
This task depends upon
Closed by George Rawlinson (rawlinsong)
Monday, 22 August 2022, 10:01 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: https://github.com/seletskiy/godiff/comm it/865648740d705a24a9cf927dfa73f45832214 1d9
Seems that the specific code/repository now has a license.
Monday, 22 August 2022, 10:01 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: https://github.com/seletskiy/godiff/comm it/865648740d705a24a9cf927dfa73f45832214 1d9
Seems that the specific code/repository now has a license.
I suggest in this case it is not a big deal to just leave this and let the licensing fix trickle down to the next release.