Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#75036 - [ttf-input] Failed to build from source incorrect checksum
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Letu Ren (FantasqueX) - Saturday, 11 June 2022, 15:02 GMT
Last edited by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro) - Monday, 13 June 2022, 12:11 GMT
Opened by Letu Ren (FantasqueX) - Saturday, 11 June 2022, 15:02 GMT
Last edited by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro) - Monday, 13 June 2022, 12:11 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
This package failed to be built because of incorrect sha256sum. Please consider running `updpkgsums` Steps to reproduce: 1. asp checkout ttf-input 2. cd ttf-input/repos/community-any 3. extra-x86_64-build |
This task depends upon
Closed by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro)
Monday, 13 June 2022, 12:11 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: I'm skipping the checksums in svn for the time being. Hopefully I can convince upstream to fix this properly.
Monday, 13 June 2022, 12:11 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: I'm skipping the checksums in svn for the time being. Hopefully I can convince upstream to fix this properly.
Comment by loqs (loqs) -
Sunday, 12 June 2022, 00:20 GMT
Are you able to generate a consistent sha256sum for Input_Fonts_20220502.zip across multiple downloads?
Comment by Letu Ren (FantasqueX) -
Sunday, 12 June 2022, 09:38 GMT
I downloaded multiple Input_Fonts_20220502.zip after noticing your reply. The result is the same as yours. All checksums of zip files are different. The inner files(e.g. ttf) of zip are also different across multiple downloads. It seems that upstream doesn't provide a reproducible zip file. I don't know how to handle it properly. Just skip checksum is not a suitable solution. Maybe host the zip file on ArchLinux repo and not to request it from upstream?