FS#7460 - sudo PKGBUILD missing arch and license vars

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Alex Heck (nesl247) - Monday, 18 June 2007, 23:55 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Tuesday, 26 June 2007, 18:51 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Current
Status Closed
Assigned To Tobias Powalowski (tpowa)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 2007.05 Duke
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:
The sudo PKGBUILD is missing arch and license vars - at least it was when I ran abs and looked at it.

If we're not supposed to report bugs like this, please tell me. I have no idea on reporting bugs about PKGBUILDS missing stuff that is changed, such as option=(!option) stuff.

Additional info:
* package version(s)
* config and/or log files etc.


Steps to reproduce:
This task depends upon

Closed by  Dan McGee (toofishes)
Tuesday, 26 June 2007, 18:51 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  fixed in new release
Comment by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Tuesday, 19 June 2007, 11:27 GMT
in fact, there seems to be a lot of packages with missing/wrong license/md5sum fields in official repos :(
Comment by Alex Heck (nesl247) - Wednesday, 20 June 2007, 07:45 GMT
Yeah. And almost all, if not all gnome packages which haven't been updated recently seem to have NOLIBTOOL or nolibtool instead of !libtool, and other such things.
Comment by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Wednesday, 20 June 2007, 23:33 GMT
The switch from no to ! is very recent, and makepkg purposely works with both. It will take some time to change all of them, and it isn't worth changing unless the package is actually being updated.
Comment by Alex Heck (nesl247) - Wednesday, 20 June 2007, 23:36 GMT
Didn't know it was that recent. And I know it works for both, just annoying at times to have to change it to remove the warning.
Comment by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Tuesday, 26 June 2007, 18:43 GMT
Fixing this one in CVS now. There are a lot of small issues like this, and I wouldn't worry about reporting it unless you see the package just got updated and it was missed. With makepkg enforcing the license and arch thing a bit more now, this shouldn't be too big of an issue.

Loading...