Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#74123 - Make LLVM 'not' identify its usage if entered without arguments or entered with '-h'
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Lawrence R. Steeger (lsteeger) - Tuesday, 15 March 2022, 08:24 GMT
Last edited by Evangelos Foutras (foutrelis) - Wednesday, 16 March 2022, 06:07 GMT
Opened by Lawrence R. Steeger (lsteeger) - Tuesday, 15 March 2022, 08:24 GMT
Last edited by Evangelos Foutras (foutrelis) - Wednesday, 16 March 2022, 06:07 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
LLVM 'not' command does not identify its usage if entered without arguments or entered with '-h' Additional info: * package version(s) llvm 13.0.1-1 * config and/or log files etc. n/a * link to upstream bug report, if any upstream owner bug report: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54324 alternate distribution bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427831 Steps to reproduce: 1. open terminal emulator 2. type 'not -h' Result: error: unable to find `-h' in PATH: No such file or directory Expected: usage help for 'not' |
This task depends upon
Closed by Evangelos Foutras (foutrelis)
Wednesday, 16 March 2022, 06:07 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Wednesday, 16 March 2022, 06:07 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
This feature request is really about the packaging of 'not' in LLVM. Unfortunately, the summary I used does not indicate that intention. The summary should be: "Change LLVM packaging of 'not' command to non-PATH directory".
From the upstream bug report: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54324#issuecomment-1064516509 it seems they think that it requires a conscious decision to include 'not' command when packaging LLVM, which is ok, of course.
The alternate distribution bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427831 shows a discussion about changing the location of 'not' in the filesystem on Red Hat.
We don't do too much splitting in Arch, and I don't see a problem with the current package, so there's nothing to do.
[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=29450045