Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#73532 - [sdl2] Build against fcitx5
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by BTD Master (btdmaster) - Thursday, 27 January 2022, 16:56 GMT
Last edited by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro) - Sunday, 20 February 2022, 03:44 GMT
Opened by BTD Master (btdmaster) - Thursday, 27 January 2022, 16:56 GMT
Last edited by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro) - Sunday, 20 February 2022, 03:44 GMT
|
DetailsThe sdl2 package currently builds against fcitx, which is currently in maintenance mode. I was able to build against fcitx5.
From what I understand, building it against fcitx5 still maintains compatibility with both versions: https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/issues/3653 sdl2 2.0.20-1 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro)
Sunday, 20 February 2022, 03:44 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Sunday, 20 February 2022, 03:44 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Comment by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro) -
Thursday, 27 January 2022, 19:34 GMT
I'm curious about this related issue: https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/issues/5124. I therefore don't quite understand what the current state is here.
Comment by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro) -
Sunday, 20 February 2022, 03:44 GMT
I went ahead and built against fcitx5. I looked into it more and it seems safe as it's backwards compatible.