Pacman

Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.

The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues

This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
Tasklist

FS#7319 - An --disable-abs configure option would be useful for !archlinux

Attached to Project: Pacman
Opened by Marc - A. Dahlhaus (wraiden) - Thursday, 31 May 2007, 08:33 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Thursday, 31 May 2007, 22:50 GMT
Task Type Feature Request
Category General
Status Closed
Assigned To Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
Dan McGee (toofishes)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 3.0.4
Due in Version 3.1.0
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

I think there should be a --disable-abs configure option for anything apart from archlinux.

This option could disable the etc/abs subdirectory and scripts/abs.in from installation.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Dan McGee (toofishes)
Thursday, 31 May 2007, 22:50 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  Applied in GIT.
Comment by Andrew Fyfe (space-m0nkey) - Thursday, 31 May 2007, 17:51 GMT
Patch to implement this.
   0001-FS7319-Add-option-to-dis... (2.2 KiB)
Comment by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Thursday, 31 May 2007, 21:09 GMT
Thanks for the patch - but does this break some things in makepkg? as far as I know, it's the abs.conf is used for the 'builddeps' flag and things like that.

What's the best way to handle "builddeps" if abs isn't there ?(personal note: I think builddeps is dumb anyway, but some people probably use it)
Comment by Andrew Fyfe (space-m0nkey) - Thursday, 31 May 2007, 21:25 GMT
It doesn't "break" makepkg, makepkg checks if abs.conf exists before it tries to source it. Without abs.conf and no `SRCROOT=... makepkg` it will bail out with an error saying define SRCROOT in makepkg.conf

Comment by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Thursday, 31 May 2007, 21:36 GMT
I like this idea. I'll pull it into my working branch sometime. Any other components that should be configurable? Biggest one I can think of would be disabling the static build, etc. although that has limited usefulness.

Loading...