Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#72500 - Total package download percentage more than 100%
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Christian Cornelssen (ccorn) - Thursday, 21 October 2021, 13:10 GMT
Opened by Christian Cornelssen (ccorn) - Thursday, 21 October 2021, 13:10 GMT
|
DetailsPacman version: 6.0.1-2-x86_64
The Total package download percentage can become significantly more than 100%. In the output snippet below it is 329% and increasing. vim-runtime-8.2.3441-1-x86_64 is up to date vim-8.2.3441-1-x86_64 is up to date virtualbox-host-dkms-6.1.28-2-x86_64 708.6 KiB 118 KiB/s 00:06 [#######################################] 100% virtualbox-6.1.28-2-x86_64 26.5 MiB 49.7 KiB/s 03:01 [#############################----------] 75% Total (519/534) 565.4 MiB 49.7 KiB/s --:-- [#######################################] 329% This observation contradicts my expectation that the total percentage represents a fraction of two sizes approaching 1 = 100% from below. Perhaps that is related to some packages having been downloaded already but not installed yet. |
This task depends upon
[aurutils]: https://github.com/AladW/aurutils/blob/master/man1/aur.1#L201
With an unstable internet connection that would occasionally drop to a speed of 0 it would try another mirror and reset the part percentage and downloaded MiB but would not reset total % nor total downloaded MiB which if it was successful would ultimately lead to a total % > 100.
Due to it ultimately exhausting the list of mirrors it would not ever actually go above for me though.