Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#7250 - kitchensync missing from kdepim

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Dawid Wróbel (cromo) - Wednesday, 23 May 2007, 19:40 GMT
Last edited by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Sunday, 27 May 2007, 13:31 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Tobias Powalowski (tpowa)
Architecture All
Severity Medium
Priority Normal
Reported Version 2007.05 Duke
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 1
Private No

Details

It seems that the kdepim has not been built correctly. Kitchensync has been rewritten for 3.5.7 release and now is basiacally just an opensync backend for kde. However, according to the PKGBUILD that was used to build the 3.5.7 kdepim package makedepends=() and depends=()arrays don't include opensync libs and binaries. This I guess is the reason why the binary output is missing the kitchensync tool.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Tobias Powalowski (tpowa)
Sunday, 27 May 2007, 13:31 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Dawid Wróbel (cromo) - Wednesday, 23 May 2007, 19:42 GMT
Also, a citation from #kontact
[21:38] < pusling >go tell the archlinux team to try read the release notes and the
configuere output - instead of just shipping that kind of stuff blindly ;)

Comment by Attila (attila) - Thursday, 24 May 2007, 05:44 GMT
The most part of the sync stuff stays in the repository community (see the output of pacman -Ss sync) and perhaps this is the reason why a package from extra can't depends on it.
Comment by Dawid Wróbel (cromo) - Thursday, 24 May 2007, 08:55 GMT
I see. However there should be at least a postinstall notice about it.
And as opensync becomes more and more important nowadays I guess it could be included in extra or current.
Comment by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Sunday, 27 May 2007, 08:42 GMT
sorry guys, this just slipped, through. reading is fine but packager ml wasn'T informed about it

Loading...