Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#71925 - [shadowsocks-libev] Employ DynamicUser=yes instead of User=nobody
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Tommy Zhang (T-J-M) - Thursday, 26 August 2021, 07:09 GMT
Last edited by Toolybird (Toolybird) - Sunday, 14 May 2023, 02:23 GMT
Opened by Tommy Zhang (T-J-M) - Thursday, 26 August 2021, 07:09 GMT
Last edited by Toolybird (Toolybird) - Sunday, 14 May 2023, 02:23 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
I've got a warning reported by systemd reads '[🡕] /usr/lib/systemd/system/shadowsocks-libev@.service:8: Special user nobody configured, this is not safe!', which might be the result of 'User=nobody' in all four systemd service files related to this package. Comparing to the current solution, a better choice might employ 'DynamicUser=yes' to replace 'User=nobody', which is considered a better security-related practice. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Toolybird (Toolybird)
Sunday, 14 May 2023, 02:23 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't fix
Additional comments about closing: No longer in the repos.
Sunday, 14 May 2023, 02:23 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't fix
Additional comments about closing: No longer in the repos.
Comment by Tommy Zhang (T-J-M) -
Thursday, 26 August 2021, 07:12 GMT
P.S. I'm not an expert on how Arch's bug tracking system works. If this task is unfortunately lost from the corresponding package name, I would suggest it shadowsocks-libev with version 3.3.5-3, currently maintained by felixonmars(Felix Yan).
Comment by Tommy Zhang (T-J-M) -
Thursday, 26 August 2021, 07:15 GMT
Link to the corresponding package: https://archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/shadowsocks-libev/
Comment by Tommy Zhang (T-J-M) -
Tuesday, 31 August 2021, 10:29 GMT
A patch to fix this issue has been generated and attached to this comment.
Comment by Tommy Zhang (T-J-M) -
Sunday, 05 June 2022, 03:28 GMT
As of 05 June 2022, this problem still exists.
0001-BugFix-shadowsocks-libev...
(5 KiB)