Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#71608 - Pacman only search for a package on first repository on the list
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Guillermo (gambar) - Sunday, 25 July 2021, 01:16 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Saturday, 04 September 2021, 02:29 GMT
Opened by Guillermo (gambar) - Sunday, 25 July 2021, 01:16 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Saturday, 04 September 2021, 02:29 GMT
|
DetailsSummary and Info:
After update to version 6.0.0 (Pacman v6.0.0 - libalpm v13.0.0), when a packge is missing from firs repo on the list of repositories, it do not check on the next repository (i have only 2 repositories) and inmediatly stops update/install proccess. Steps to Reproduce: For a very particular reason i use 2 repositories, when fails to download some file from the first one i have to coment the repository line on the configuration file to download from next one, pacman do not continue automatyically like before the update. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Allan McRae (Allan)
Saturday, 04 September 2021, 02:29 GMT
Reason for closing: No response
Additional comments about closing: Works for me.
Saturday, 04 September 2021, 02:29 GMT
Reason for closing: No response
Additional comments about closing: Works for me.
Do you mean a download fails for a package from repo a and you want it to then try download from repo b?
core
extra
community
(plus extras)
> I have 2 repositories enabled on "/etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist"
You have two mirrors enabled in that file. Mirrors, not repositories.
pacman should and does try the next enabled mirror when it can't download a package from the first mirror.
...
I agree that without --debug output we can't really understand what you want here.
"pacman should and does try the next enabled mirror when it can't download a package from the first mirror."--->pacman DON'T TRY THE NEXT ENABLED mirror when it can't download a package from the first mirror.
That is the thing, fails and it don't try the next enabled mirror.